Innovation | Action | Excellence
Flying with Light
2022-11-171309

Special Characterization Methods in Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction

Original content is not easy. If you wish to reproduce this article, please contact our staff and provide the source information in the reproduced article; otherwise, copyright infringement will be pursued!

Compared to traditional photocatalytic reactions such as water splitting and pollutant degradation, photocatalytic CO₂ reduction exhibits a more diverse product distribution, including liquid products in addition to gaseous ones. 

Accurate determination of reaction products is crucial for evaluating the performance of photocatalysts. 

Photocatalytic CO₂ reduction is a complex process involving multiple electrons and protons. Due to the lack of extensive research on reaction mechanisms, the selectivity of products is challenging to control

This article aims to summarize the product detection and reaction mechanism research techniques involved in current research on photocatalytic CO₂ reduction.

1. Product Detection

1.1. Gas Product Detection

The main gas products of photocatalytic CO₂ reduction are CO and CH₄, accompanied by H₂ and O₂ generated from the decomposition of H₂O[1]. It may also produce hydrocarbons and olefins. 

H₂, O₂, CO₂, and high-concentration CO, CH₄, hydrocarbons, and olefins can all be detected using a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) in gas chromatography (GC). 

Low-concentration CO, CH₄, hydrocarbons, and olefins can be detected using a flame ionization detector (FID) in GC[2].

1.2. Liquid Product Detection

The main liquid products of photocatalytic CO₂ reduction are alcohols, carboxylic acids, and aldehydes (e.g., CH₃OH, HCOOH, HCHO, etc.)[2]

For liquid product detection, solid catalysts must first be removed using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filter, and then the products can be injected into GC for analysis using an offline needle injection method. 

Alcohols such as CH₃OH and C₂H₅OH can be detected using FID in GC. 

Aldehydes can be quantitatively analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry (Nash's colorimetric method). 

Carboxylic acids can be analyzed using HPLC and ion chromatography (IC)[1]

Adsorption of liquid products on the solid catalyst surface is a major challenge in liquid product analysis. To address this issue, substances that may interfere with product source analysis, such as CH₃OH and HCOOH, are highly soluble in water and can be analyzed by washing the catalyst with a minimal amount of H₂O and then analyzing it[2].

2. Tracing the Real Carbon Source

In addition to coming from the reactant CO₂, the C in the products of photocatalytic CO₂ reduction reactions may also be affected by photocatalysts, solvents, sacrificial agents, and even other factors such as reactors. Therefore, determining the C source in the products is crucial for the research of photocatalytic CO₂ reduction[3]

The C source in gas products like CO and CH₄ can be determined using isotope labeling (13CO₂) with the help of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). 

The C source in liquid oxygen-containing products can be determined using 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (13C NMR), GC-MS, or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)[2]

Perfectlight Technology offers testing services for tracing the real carbon source in different types of CO₂ reduction reactions, such as photocatalysis, photothermal catalysis, photoelectrocatalysis, and electrocatalysis. We provide isotope tracing testing for 13C, 18O, and D₂O isotope tracing for qualitative and quantitative analysis with a professional testing team and accompanying spectrum analysis services.

Isotope Testing 1.jpg

Tracing the real carbon source in photocatalytic CO₂ reduction reactions involves selecting and optimizing the type of chromatographic column and test conditions, establishing isotope separation and analysis methods, obtaining standard mass spectra, and building online analysis methods for isotope-labeled source product tracing. This approach efficiently separates interfering substances in source product analysis and effectively traces different products in CO₂ reduction reactions, allowing for a real and accurate measurement of catalyst activity in CO₂ reduction reactions.

3. Reaction Mechanism Research

Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction involves multiple reaction pathways and complex intermediates[4]. Therefore, researching the reaction mechanism helps in a deep understanding of the complex reaction kinetics in photocatalytic CO₂ reduction and aids in the rational design of highly active and selective photocatalysts[5]

In situ characterization techniques can be used to detect intermediates and determine catalytic active centers, and they have been widely used in catalysis research[5].

Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy (DRIFTS) is the most common technique used in the research of photocatalytic CO₂ reaction mechanisms, mainly for determining intermediates and reaction pathways[6,7]. 

In addition, in situ electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), in situ diffuse reflectance ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-vis), and density functional theory (DFT) calculations can also be used for mechanism research[8-10].

The above sections have been translated and summarized based on the reference literature, and if there are any errors, please feel free to point them out!

References

[1]Hong Jindui, Zhang Wei, Xu Rong*, et, al., Photocatalytic reduction of CO2: a brief review on product analysis and systematic methods[J]. Analytical Methods, 2013, 5, 1086. 

[2]Kandy Mufeedah Muringa*, Rajeev K Anjana, Sankaralingam Muniyandi*, Development of proficient photocatalytic systems for enhanced photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide[J]. Sustainable Energy Fuels, 2021, 5, 12-33.

 [3]Gong Eunhee, Ali Shahzad, In Su-Il* et. al., Solar fuels: research and development strategies to accelerate photocatalytic CO2 conversion into hydrocarbon fuels[J]. Energy Environmental Science, 2022. DOI: 10.1039/d1ee0271 

[4]Behera Arjun, Kumar Kar Ashish, Srivastava Rajendra* et. al., Challenges and prospects in the selective photoreduction of CO2 to C1 and C2 products with nanostructured materials: a review[J]. Materials Horizons, 2022, 9, 607-639.

 [5]Shen Huidong, Peppel Tim*, Sun Zhenyu*, et. al., Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 by metal-free-Based materials: recent advances and future perspective[J]. Solar RRL 2020, 4, 1900546.

 [6]Zhao Junze, Ji Mengxia, Xia Jiexiang*, et. al., Interfacial chemical bond modulated Bi19S27Br3/g-C3N4 Z-scheme heterojunction for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 conversion[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2022, 307, 121162.

[7]Kou Mingpu, Liu Wei, Ye Liqun*, et. al., Photocatalytic CO2 conversion over single-atom MoN2 sites of covalent organic framework[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 291, 120146. 

[8]Lin Lin, Zhang Xuehua*, He Tao*, Highly efficient visible-light driven photocatalytic reduction of CO2 over g-C3N4 nanosheets/tetra(4-carboxyphenyl)-porphyrin iron(III) chloride heterogeneous catalysts[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2018, 211, 312-319. 

[9]Yang Sizhuo, Zhang Jian*, Huang Jier*, et. al., 2D covalent organic frameworks as intrinsic photocatalysts for visible light-driven CO2 reduction[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2018, 140, 14614-14618. 

[10]Yu H., Sun C. Chang K.*, et. al., Full solar spectrum driven plasmonic-assisted efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction to ethanol[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022 430, 132940.

Download